A cogent explanation of my electoral views

| Comments (2)

From the noted hate site DailyKos:

I have been closely following the campaigns of both Senator Obama and Hillary Clinton, and quite frankly, if anyone is exhibiting arrogance and a sense of entitlement, it has been Senator Clinton, along with her husband, whom I used to be an avid supporter and defender. Through Rovian tactics, right out of the play book of the Republicans, she and her campaign have engaged in a divisive, negative, destructive campaign, often siding and praising Senator McCain to tear down her Democratic opponent. The fact that Senator Obama hasn't lowered himself to her level tells me a lot more about a person's character than some right wing gossip or out of context media spin.

Senator Clinton and Bill Clinton assumed that Hillary would be the nominee, and subsequently have executed a disorganized, unprepared and incompetent campaign, blaming everything from the caucuses to youthful exuberance and enthusiasm. They have made excuse after excuse for why Obama is winning, never accepting responsibility for their own failings. In my judgment, this is a perfect example of hubris.

I am voting for the person, not the sex, nor the race of a candidate. I am supporting a man who happens to be of mixed race who has lived in different countries, who has experienced different cultures. His impoverished childhood gives him a fundamental understanding and empathy for the less fortunate. He has shown in his life that he is a champion for the poor. After paying for his own education through student loans and scholarships, he chose to work as a community organizer instead of a private law firm where he could have made a lot more money. Senator Obama sponsored and worked for legislation in Illinois that addressed the needs of poor and middle class working Americans, and has continued that legacy in the United States Senate. I believe a person's actual history tells you more about their character than rhetoric.

Your belief that we Obama supporters are somehow mesmerized like some kind of naive sheep, basing our endorsement for the man on irrational emotions is preposterous. Certainly we hold no delusions that Senator Obama is perfect or a savior of mankind. But heck yes, we're enthusiastic. For the first time in a long time we are excited about someone who exhibits intelligence, wisdom, and yes, hope.

I would like to know how you came to the conclusion that Senator Obama's "ascendancy is more symbolic than substantive." Senator Obama may not be as old as Senator Clinton, but he has had a lifetime of experience deeply involved in public policy and community activism. Senator Clinton's experiences as First Lady were admirable, but certainly should not be equated with involvement in policy making decisions.

Senator Clinton has lied about NAFTA saying she was against it, yet video clips show that she supported it during the Clinton administration. She joined in the Reverend Wright attacks yet she and Bill invited Reverend Wright into their home during the Lewinsky affair for marital guidance. Senator Clinton stated that she was against the war in Iraq--even before Senator Obama's public denouncement, yet she voted for it and video clips prove this is too a lie. She ridiculed Senator Obama as being an elitist when she and Bill are worth millions and have occupied mansions for most of their lives including the governor's mansion in Arkansas and the White House. I could cite many more examples, but I think you get the picture.

In your letter you said: Republicans are salivating at the chance to run against him. (Obama) Yet, right wing extremists like Rush Limbaugh are engaging in campaigns to get Republicans to vote for Hillary because they know McCain has a better chance to beat her than Obama. In Denton County alone there was a 4% crossover from Republican to Democrat, many Republicans following Rush's "Operation Chaos" to help Hillary win Texas. It is obvious the Republicans are salivating to run against Senator Clinton due to a deep seated and historical hatred toward the Clintons.

I for one am tired of hypocrisy and lies. I am fed up with Rovian style tactics. It is truly a shame that Senator Clinton along with Bill, have chosen this road, because not only has it ruined the legacy of President Clinton, it has divided the Democratic party. She could have made her case for why she would be the better candidate with grace and distinction. Instead, the Clintons have chosen to exhibit arrogance and dishonesty.

2 Comments

testing

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing photos in a set called kids. Make your own badge here.
-->

Musica del Rock

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en

Archives

Recent Assets

  • urchins.jpg
  • playerpiano.jpg
  • page.jpg
  • ghosthouse_sm.jpg
  • changeucanhazit.jpg
  • 40462414.jpg
  • mccain_wrong_way.jpg
  • Bill-The-Cat.jpg
  • mctongue.jpg
  • vrg45.jpg

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jeremy published on April 22, 2008 9:08 AM.

'A Deal Is A Deal...' was the previous entry in this blog.

Maybe... is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.